| From: | Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Evgeniy Shishkin <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tuning the configuration |
| Date: | 2014-12-11 12:48:09 |
| Message-ID: | 54899289.40307@mbigroup.it |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2014 01:11 PM, Evgeniy Shishkin wrote:
>
>> On 11 Dec 2014, at 15:02, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/10/2014 11:44 AM, Maila Fatticcioni wrote:
>>> 2- I would like to use the two SDD to store the wal file. Do
>>> you think it is useful or how should I use them?
>>
>> I definitely would give it a try.
>>
>
>
> I don't understand the logic behind using drives, which are best
> for random io, for sequent io workloads.
>
> Better use 10k sas with BBU raid for wal, money wise.
>
>
>
Would you mind to explain me better why you do suggest me to use the
sas raid for wal please?
Thanks,
M.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlSJkokACgkQi2q3wPb3FcOOZQCgrhy3sOP3Jds1eGlPqjSW+GhM
xFIAn3YbZgEFAlwTC+SX7GG2My0pElys
=Bsn7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrea Suisani | 2014-12-11 13:16:56 | Re: Tuning the configuration |
| Previous Message | Evgeniy Shishkin | 2014-12-11 12:11:05 | Re: Tuning the configuration |