From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands |
Date: | 2025-02-04 00:58:35 |
Message-ID: | 548696.1738630715@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... For this
> particular item, I'm still of the opinion that leaving it as "List of
> relations" is a pretty good default for some future somebody who forgets to
> update the lists of relation types. New types are certainly not going to
> happen often. Better "List of relations" than a release where everybody and
> their cousin starts asking what "List of ???" means.
Hopefully an oversight like that wouldn't make it to release. But
hiding it by putting out an ordinary-looking title might help it
avoid detection for a long time.
> P.S. I found it amusing to see in some quick grepping that pg_controldata
> has a msgstr of "???". So far no language has managed to translate it into
> something else.
There are several pre-existing "???" strings in describe.c too,
for similar this-shouldn't-happen cases. I'm not proposing
something that's far outside our existing practice.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhang Mingli | 2025-02-04 01:31:06 | Re: Prevent COPY FREEZE on Foreign tables |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-04 00:54:19 | Re: Question -- why is there no errhint_internal function? |