From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries. |
Date: | 2014-12-09 01:59:41 |
Message-ID: | 5486578D.4050304@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/8/14 12:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> My radical proposal therefore would have been to embrace this
>> inconsistency and get rid of PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND altogether,
>> relying on users interpreting the parameter names to indicate that
>> changing them later may or may not have an effect. Unfortunately, the
>> concerns about ignore_system_indexes prevent that.
>
> What exactly are those concerns? Do you have a link to previous discussion?
Earlier in the thread:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20108.1415120322@sss.pgh.pa.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2014-12-09 02:11:16 | thinko in convertToJsonb() |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-12-09 01:42:18 | Re: pg_recvlogical description |