| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum improvements |
| Date: | 2007-01-16 02:52:53 |
| Message-ID: | 5483.1168915973@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Is there any chance of a race condition here? That is, can the launcher
> process start a new autovacuum process against that database that your
> code will miss since it was started after you began your search?
No; we're holding a lock against incoming processes in that database.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-16 05:07:12 | Re: xml type and encodings |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-01-16 02:36:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum improvements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CN | 2007-01-16 03:09:36 | Re: BCC55 and libpq 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-01-16 02:36:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum improvements |