| From: | Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Julian v(dot) Bock" <bock(at)openit(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is the most optimal config parameters to keep stable write TPS ?.. |
| Date: | 2009-05-12 15:41:14 |
| Message-ID: | 5482c80a0905120841i30ec159ue0756c218d7d2666@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Good point! I missed it.. - will 20MB be enough?
Rgds,
-Dimitri
On 5/12/09, Julian v. Bock <bock(at)openit(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi
>
>>>>>> "D" == Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> D> current postgresql.conf:
>
> D> #================================
> D> max_connections = 2000 # (change requires restart)
> D> temp_buffers = 200MB
>
> temp_buffers are kept per connection and not freed until the session
> ends. If you use some kind of connection pooling this can eat up a lot
> of ram that could be used for caching instead.
>
> Regards,
> Julian
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-05-12 15:46:37 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Previous Message | Dimitri | 2009-05-12 15:37:45 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |