Re: Best filesystem for a high load db

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best filesystem for a high load db
Date: 2014-11-25 21:19:31
Message-ID: 5474F263.7010803@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/25/2014 9:43 AM, Maila Fatticcioni wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> I need to install a Postgresql 9.4 cluster with two servers at first
> instance. The database will be used in an enviroment with high load, a
> lot number of clients will do queries that require fast replies.
> I have to install Ubuntu 14.04 as OS and I would like to know which
> filesystem you would suggest me to use. I have read that ZFS with ZIL
> is now mature for a production server: do you think it is that true or
> that it would be better to stay safer with a common EXT4?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Maila Fatticcioni
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlR0o68ACgkQi2q3wPb3FcM0/ACgwWEPZ+8dhvJPcjvoZq0GSfDJ
> 1p8AnjNFd2Mb9Nms4jTfRywn0MBmtVAW
> =wvKu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

A long while back I benched Ext4 vs xfs, and xfs won.

I've been using xfs for a long while now and love it.

You don't need to guess with mount options anymore. The defaults are best.

-Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-25 21:24:25 Re: SQL functions and triggers?
Previous Message Dev Kumkar 2014-11-25 21:07:51 Lock Management: Waiting on locks