Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date: 2014-11-24 22:22:37
Message-ID: 5473AFAD.8050306@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/24/2014 02:18 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Before I go into my ideas, though, what does the current patch do
>>>> regarding non-replication PITR?
>>>
>>> It removes that $PGDATA/standby.enable trigger file it relies on to
>>> start the PITR in the first place.
>>
>> OK, and that's required for replication too? I'm OK with that if it
>> gets the patch in.
>
> In the current form of the patch, yes. Thought I don't think I like it.

One step at a time.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Barwick 2014-11-24 22:54:25 Re: Comment header for src/test/regress/regress.c
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-24 22:19:53 Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)