From: | "vincent" <vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
Date: | 2007-08-16 07:46:11 |
Message-ID: | 5468.84.107.170.210.1187250371.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>>> 2. Robust transactional ACID behavior under all circumstances
>> Async commit changes that, since it relaxes the Durability aspect.
>
> And one can wreak havoc right now if you turn fsync off. Maybe the
> wording may need to be tweaked here. The disclaimer in the detailed
> document is "barring hardware failure or grossly improper configuration".
> If you expected ACID, but used Async commit, that certainly falls into the
> improper configuration category.
>
Does the reader really need to know so many details in a list like this?
PgSQL defaults to ACID, which is the point I'd like to make in a list like
this; the user does not have to do anything special to get ACID, unlike
some databases who shall rename nameless...
Sure a user can force non-acid behaviour, that's not what you want to put
forward when promoting PgSQL. It's the truth, but it's too much
information.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-08-16 15:12:50 | Oracle 11g |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-16 07:22:41 | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |