| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
| Date: | 2018-01-24 12:50:10 |
| Message-ID: | 5462dc00-4941-167e-b287-d7bd9b2283e9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I wonder whether this should be dealing with sequences at all. We are
not currently publishing any information about sequences, so it seems
weird to do it only here. Also, I'd imagine that if we ever get to
publishing sequence events, then the sequence restarts would be
published as independent events.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2018-01-24 12:53:50 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2018-01-24 12:11:47 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.6: view based on sequence |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2018-01-24 12:53:50 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2018-01-24 12:44:47 | Re: Is it valid to have logical replication between 2 databases on the same postgres server? |