| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries. |
| Date: | 2014-11-04 16:22:03 |
| Message-ID: | 5458FD2B.5000504@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/9/14 1:58 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Also I think that it's useful to allow ALTER ROLE/DATABASE SET to
> set PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND parameters. So, what
> about applying the attached patch? This patch allows that and
> changes the context of session_preload_libraries to PGC_SU_BACKEND.
After looking through this again, I wonder whether there is any reason
why ignore_system_indexes cannot be plain PGC_USERSET. With this
change, we'd allow setting it via ALTER ROLE, but the access to
pg_db_role_setting happens before it. So if there is anything unsafe
about changing ignore_system_indexes, then this would be a problem, but
I don't see anything.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Wooten | 2014-11-04 16:22:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Pipelining executions to postgresql server |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2014-11-04 16:14:00 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #11867: Strange behaviour with composite types after resetting database tablespace |