From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: assignment vs SELECT INTO |
Date: | 2014-11-03 20:31:16 |
Message-ID: | 5457E614.1030902@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 11/03/2014 03:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> andrew=# do $x$ declare r abc; begin for i in 1 .. 10000000 loop
>> select 'a','b',i into r.x,r.y,r.z; end loop; end; $x$;
>> DO
>> Time: 63731.434 ms
>> andrew=# do $x$ declare r abc; begin for i in 1 .. 10000000 loop r
>> := ('a','b',i); end loop; end; $x$;
>> DO
>> Time: 18744.151 ms
>> Is it simply because the SELECT is in effect three assignments, so it
>> takes nearly 3 times as long?
> I think it's more likely that the second example is treated as a "simple
> expression" so it has less overhead than a SELECT.
>
>
Well, I accidetally left out this case:
andrew=# do $x$ declare r abc; begin for i in 1 .. 10000000 loop
select row('a','b',i) into r; end loop; end; $x$;
DO
Time: 81919.721 ms
which is slower still.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stuart Bishop | 2014-11-04 12:34:24 | Re: Replication Lag Causes |
Previous Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2014-11-03 20:27:03 | Re: assignment vs SELECT INTO |