Re: A local replication entry

From: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Shreeyansh dba <shreeyansh2014(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A local replication entry
Date: 2014-10-29 15:35:44
Message-ID: 54510950.90100@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I thought you might be correct, Tom, but I double-checked the postgresql.conf file and listen_addresses = "*". I had forgotten to look to see if netstat reported:

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5432 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN

But even with that established, the pg_basebackup using:

/usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/pg_basebackup -D - -h 127.0.0.1 -Ft -z -c fast -l hourly.backup > backup_file.gz or
/usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/pg_basebackup -D - -h 127.0.0.1 -U postgres -Ft -z -c fast -l hourly.backup > backup_file.gz

are still failing with:

pg_basebackup: could not connect to server: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for replication connection from host "127.0.0.1", user "postgres", SSL off

The line from the pg_hba.conf file currently reads:

host replication postgres 127.0.0.1/32 trust

I really don't see where the problem is, and I know I've done a reload after every change in the pg-hba.conf.

On 10/29/2014 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> And I performed a "service postgresql-9.3 reload", and it still failed with the same error. Then, I tried again using a "-h 127.0.0.1" option for the pg_basebackup. That complained
>> "pg_basebackup: could not connect to server: connection refused." So, I did a "netstat -an | grep 5432" and I see that postgresql is not listening on that port for 127.0.0.1.
> Hm, that suggests your problem is with the setting of listen_addresses,
> not just what's in pg_hba.conf.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-29 16:20:09 Re: A local replication entry
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-29 15:05:42 Re: A local replication entry