Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-10-29 08:24:20
Message-ID: 5450A434.3000505@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/06/2014 02:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-10-06 14:19:39 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Barring objections, I'll commit this, and then continue benchmarking the
>> second patch with the WAL format and API changes.
>
> I'd like to have a look at it beforehand.

Ping? Here's an rebased patch. I'd like to proceed with this.

> I've not yet really looked,
> but on a quick readthrough XLogInsertRecData() staying in xlog.c doesn't
> make me happy...

Ok.. Can you elaborate?

- Heikki

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Move-the-backup-block-logic-from-XLogInsert-to-a-new-2.patch text/x-diff 97.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2014-10-29 08:47:39 Re: alter user/role CURRENT_USER
Previous Message Noah Misch 2014-10-29 06:39:49 Re: Allow peer/ident to fall back to md5?