| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | How ugly would this be? (ALTER DATABASE) |
| Date: | 2014-10-24 18:06:50 |
| Message-ID: | 544A953A.7010001@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
One of the things we run into quite a bit is customers who are using
multiple databases when they should be using multiple schemas. I am sure
other consultants run into this as well. This gets even more difficult
as uptime requirements have become all but 100%. So my question is, what
would this take?
ALTER DATABASE foo LOCATION DATABASE bar SCHEMA baz?
Where if we execute that command, database foo would move to schema baz
within database bar?
I am fully aware of what it takes on the client side but structurally
within postgres what would it take? Is it even reasonable?
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
not be surprised when they come back as Romans."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2014-10-24 18:12:00 | Re: Question about RI checks |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-24 18:05:27 | Re: BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves) |