From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review |
Date: | 2014-10-16 11:22:13 |
Message-ID: | 543FAA65.3070905@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15/10/14 07:22, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> First though, the new privileges, about which the bikeshedding can
> begin, short-and-sweet format:
>
> BACKUP:
> pg_start_backup()
> pg_stop_backup()
> pg_switch_xlog()
> pg_create_restore_point()
As others have commented, I too think this should support pg_dump.
>
> For posterity's sake, here's my review and comments on the various
> existing superuser checks in the backend (those not addressed above):
>
> CREATE EXTENSION
> This could be a role attribute as the others above, but I didn't
> want to try and include it in this patch as it has a lot of hairy
> parts, I expect.
Yeah it will, mainly because extensions can load modules and can have
untrusted functions, we might want to limit which extensions are
possible to create without being superuser.
>
> tcop/utility.c
> LOAD (load shared library)
>
This already somewhat handles non-superuser access. You can do LOAD as
normal user as long as the library is in $libdir/plugins directory so it
probably does not need separate role attribute (might be somehow useful
in combination with CREATE EXTENSION though).
>
> commands/functioncmds.c
> create untrusted-language functions
>
I often needed more granularity there (plproxy).
>
> commands/functioncmds.c
> execute DO blocks with untrusted languages
>
I am not sure if this is significantly different from untrusted-language
functions.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-10-16 11:24:40 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2014-10-16 11:04:28 | Re: Performance regression: 9.2+ vs. ScalarArrayOpExpr vs. ORDER BY |