Re: Partitions and work_mem?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com>, Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitions and work_mem?
Date: 2014-10-15 22:25:06
Message-ID: 543EF442.5000206@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/15/2014 01:19 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> Sorry I don't understand what you mean by that. My understanding is that
> RedHat maintains fixes for security and other major issues for packages
> that have been EOLed. Are you implying that that's not the case? Or
> something else?

RH probably backpatches our fixes as they come out. They did in the
past, anyway.

I just had the impression from your original post that this was a new
system; if so, it would make sense to build it on a version of Postgres
which wasn't already EOL.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-15 22:58:14 Re: Partitions and work_mem?
Previous Message Igor Neyman 2014-10-15 21:00:21 Re: Partitions and work_mem?