From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DDL Damage Assessment |
Date: | 2014-10-02 19:07:42 |
Message-ID: | 542DA27E.3070907@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/02/2014 09:30 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Questions:
>
> 1. Do you agree that a systematic way to report what a DDL command (or
> script, or transaction) is going to do on your production database
> is a feature we should provide to our growing user base?
I would say it is late to the game and a great feature.
>
> 2. What do you think such a feature should look like?
>
I liked the other post that said: EXPLAIN <ALTER TABLE> or whatever.
Heck it could even be useful to have EXPLAIN ANALZYE <ALTER TABLE> in
case people want to run it on staging/test/dev environments to judge impact.
> 3. Does it make sense to support the whole set of DDL commands from the
> get go (or ever) when most of them are only taking locks in their
> own pg_catalog entry anyway?
I would think that introducing this incrementally makes sense.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
not be surprised when they come back as Romans."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-02 19:19:33 | TAP test breakage on MacOS X |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-10-02 18:06:03 | Re: Inefficient barriers on solaris with sun cc |