| From: | Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bogdan Pilch <bogdan(at)matfyz(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time measurement format - more human readable |
| Date: | 2014-10-01 13:58:02 |
| Message-ID: | 542C086A.90509@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/29/14, 1:08 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-09-28 20:32:30 -0400, Gregory Smith wrote:
>> There are already a wide range of human readable time interval output
>> formats available in the database; see the list at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-datetime.html#INTERVAL-STYLE-OUTPUT-TABLE
> He's talking about psql's \timing...
I got that. My point was that even though psql's timing report is kind
of a quick thing hacked into there, if it were revised I'd expect two
things will happen eventually:
-Asking if any of the the interval conversion code can be re-used for
this purpose, rather than adding yet another custom to one code path
"standard".
-Asking if this should really just be treated like a full interval
instead, and then overlapping with a significant amount of that baggage
so that you have all the existing format choices.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-10-01 13:58:05 | Re: "Value locking" Wiki page |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-10-01 13:49:19 | Re: "Value locking" Wiki page |