From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pdasari(at)mdsol(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys |
Date: | 2014-09-30 19:10:54 |
Message-ID: | 542B003E.3090801@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 9/30/2014 11:44 AM, pdasari(at)mdsol(dot)com wrote:
> We are using Amazon Redshift postgreSQL. no matter what jar file we use it
> gives the following error message.
jar file? what is this jar file? Do you mean JDBC ? The
PostgreSQL JDBC driver is its own project, has its own mailling lists.
The bug report form you used is for the core database server, which has
no Java components.
> Upon browsing, found that the source code is reading the max_index_keys
> should be greater than 0. However the redshift database does not require
> indexing. I really appreciate your assistance if there is any specific jar
> to use to avoid using the max_index_keys function while executing the query
>
> Below is the error we encountered:
>
> Unable to determine a value for MaxIndexKeys due to missing system catalog
> data
While PostgreSQL doesn't require indexes, its standard practice in
relational databases to always define a primary key for every table.
I'm not sure why JDBC would be enforcing this.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Dasari | 2014-09-30 19:16:10 | Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys |
Previous Message | pdasari | 2014-09-30 18:44:13 | BUG #11528: Max Index Keys |