| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: open items for 9.4 |
| Date: | 2014-09-30 17:17:52 |
| Message-ID: | 542AE5C0.3040104@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/30/2014 04:56 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> There seems to be no decisive consensus here. I'm going to put my foot
> on the ground and go remove it, as I'm leaning towards that option, and
> we need to get the release out. But if someone objects loudly enough to
> actually write the documentation and commit it that way, I'm happy with
> that too.
I'm also in favor of removing it. We really don't need more GUCs which
nobody has any clear idea how to change or why.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-09-30 17:28:02 | Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3 |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-30 17:07:55 | Re: pg_dump bug in 9.4beta2 and HEAD |