Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" <tigran(dot)mkrtchyan(at)desy(dot)de>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4
Date: 2014-09-25 04:39:40
Message-ID: 54239C8C.6010902@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 25/09/14 01:03, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote:
>
> With pg_test_timing I can see, that overhead is 48 nsec on my server and 32 nsec on the laptop.
> what makes this difference and have it any influence on the overall performance?
>

Hmm - 22 nsec for my workstation, so while it could be a factor, your
laptop and my workstation performed the pgbench about the same, so I'd
look elsewhere - in particlular sync IO performance:

$ cd <where ssd mounted>
$ pg_test_fsync
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.

Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 140.231 ops/sec 7131
usecs/op
fdatasync 138.159 ops/sec 7238
usecs/op
fsync 137.680 ops/sec 7263
usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 137.202 ops/sec 7289
usecs/op

Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 68.832 ops/sec 14528
usecs/op
fdatasync 135.994 ops/sec 7353
usecs/op
fsync 137.454 ops/sec 7275
usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 69.092 ops/sec 14473
usecs/op

Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
(This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
in different write open_sync sizes.)
1 * 16kB open_sync write 136.904 ops/sec 7304
usecs/op
2 * 8kB open_sync writes 68.857 ops/sec 14523
usecs/op
4 * 4kB open_sync writes 34.744 ops/sec 28782
usecs/op
8 * 2kB open_sync writes write failed: Invalid argument

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-09-26 08:06:07 Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3
Previous Message Imre Samu 2014-09-24 14:38:39 Re: postgres 9.3 vs. 9.4