From: | adam_pgsql <adam_pgsql(at)witneyweb(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OT - pg perl DBI question |
Date: | 2008-01-29 13:56:03 |
Message-ID: | 542170FB-1464-4515-8296-6E7EB1B51453@witneyweb.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 29 Jan 2008, at 13:39, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:04PM +0000, adam_pgsql wrote:
>>
>> this looks to be using the Pg module rather than DBI + DBD::Pg. This
>> one i think:
>>
>> http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/ME/MERGL/pgsql_perl5-1.9.0.tar.gz
>>
>> i think thats quite old now though....
>
> In the one in this package:
> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libpg-perl
>
> It's not old. It's kept reasonably up to date. It's more or less a
> shim
> over the C library and has direct access to all its features, which is
> not always possible with DBD:Pg.
ah sorry, i was just looking at the date on CPAN for
pgsql_perl5-1.9.0.tar.gz which says 04-Apr-2000.
Thanks for the more up to date info though.
adam
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2008-01-29 14:21:34 | Re: OT - pg perl DBI question |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-01-29 13:39:05 | Re: OT - pg perl DBI question |