Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
Date: 2014-09-18 19:16:35
Message-ID: 541B2F93.8060606@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/18/2014 11:44 AM, cowwoc wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I meant. I just wanted to reinforce the fact that you
> don't need to bundle multiple JVMs (Oracle, OpenJDK and GCJ). You'd pick
> one and bundle it alongside PG and pl/java.

I think a lawyer would have to pick apart the JRE redistribution license
to confirm that this use case is acceptable... the catch-22 is that
pljava is running user java modules, not just the software its being
distributed with, and I'm not sure the redistribution license allows that.

specifically...

> License to Distribute Software. Subject to ..., Oracle grants you ... license ... to ... distribute the Software ..., provided that (i) you distribute the Software ... only bundled as part of, and for the sole purpose of running, your Programs, (ii)...

its that 'sole purpose' part that I wonder about. FWIW, thats from the JRE 6 binary license, I didn't find the 7 or 8 one in a quick google search.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cowwoc 2014-09-18 19:33:05 Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
Previous Message cowwoc 2014-09-18 18:44:48 Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?