From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | cowwoc <cowwoc(at)bbs(dot)darktech(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature request: temporary schemas |
Date: | 2014-09-15 00:34:42 |
Message-ID: | 54163422.9080205@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 09/14/2014 02:01 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the ability to create temporary schemas.
>
> Unlike temporary tables, this feature would enable developers to create a
> temporary schema once and execute CREATE TABLE statements without the
> TEMPORARY parameter.
>
> This would facilitate running unit tests, where developers would like to run
> the same creation script for unit tests and production code but do not wish
> to parameterize each CREATE TABLE statement (both environments are expected
> to execute identical scripts). It further enables the use of temporary
> functions, something which is not possible today (apparently you can hack
> this too, but there isn't an "official" way of doing so).
>
> See http://dba.stackexchange.com/q/76494/4719 for a related discussion.
>
> Should I move this discussion to a different mailing list or is this the
> correct location?
So from the above link and the discussion here so far I gather you want:
1) A CREATE TEMPORARY SCHEMA that behaves like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE,
where it lasts only for a session and masks any existing schema and
contained objects with the same name for the duration.
2) You want to run this on a test database as so you can have 'masked'
tests over the permanent schema. Presumably because the tests can be
destructive and you do not want change the underlying structure and/or
data in your test database.
3) This needs to happen on the order of 4-10 times a second and it needs
to be tied to a session, as multiple transactions need to be run in each
test.
As to whether this is the appropriate list, I would say yes at least for
sounding out the idea. The list to address for dealing with the folks
that actually would implement the idea I would suggest --hackers.
In the meantime, the only way I can see doing this is creating and
dropping databases. Not sure that would meet your 4-10 times a second
requirement though.
>
> Thanks,
> Gili
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | cowwoc | 2014-09-15 03:21:08 | Re: Feature request: temporary schemas |
Previous Message | Nick Guenther | 2014-09-14 22:07:07 | Re: Feature request: temporary schemas |