Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> SET CONSTRAINTS still does what it used to do, which is to alter the
>> behavior of all constraints with the given name. We should probably
>> expand the syntax so that a particular table name can be mentioned.
> Is this a TODO?
Nobody objected to my statement, so I guess so ...
regards, tom lane