From: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
Date: | 2014-09-02 21:08:43 |
Message-ID: | 540631DB.2000409@wi3ck.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Without having read the entire thread ...
On 09/01/2014 05:04 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> From the top of my head, these are Things I personally would want to
> see in plpgsql2:
> + Make UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE throw error if they didnt' modify exactly 1
> row, as that's the most common use-case, and provide alternative syntax
> to modify multiple or zero rows.
I think this is a completely flawed proposal "by definition". SQL itself
does not make such assumption and as a SET oriented language, never
should. A SET is zero or more tuples. Would you also suggest that the
PostgreSQL backend throw an ERROR if an UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE doesn't
modify exactly 1 row? If not, explain why there should be a difference
between SQL executed from the frontend and SQL executed by a PL/pgSQL
function.
-1 from me.
> + Change all warnings into errors
I suggest being slightly more selective on that one.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2014-09-02 21:11:49 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-09-02 20:48:44 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |