| From: | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 09:52:34 |
| Message-ID: | 54059362.30005@nosys.es |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/09/14 11:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> For 9.4, we have the media already saying "Postgres has NoSQL
> capabilities" (which is only partially true). For x.y we could
> have the media saying "Postgres adds Oracle compatibility" (which
> would be only partially true). But that brings a lot of users to
> postgres, and that helps us all.
>
>
> Partial true can enforce so lot of people will hate postgres too.
> False promises are wrong
Then let's stop talking about postgres being NoSQL. NoSQL is
basically "schema-less" (really bad name) plus "infinite scalability"
(which basically means transparent sharding). We fail to provide the
latter very clearly...
Álvaro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2014-09-02 09:55:27 | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-02 09:51:05 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |