Re: Tips/advice for implementing integrated RESTful HTTP API

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dobes Vandermeer <dobesv(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tips/advice for implementing integrated RESTful HTTP API
Date: 2014-08-31 13:07:04
Message-ID: 54031DF8.2050509@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/31/14 12:40 AM, Dobes Vandermeer wrote:
> The background workers can apparently only connect to a single database
> at a time, but I want to expose all the databases via the API.

I think the term "background worker" should be taken as a hint that
"foreground protocol endpoint" was not one of the envisioned use cases.
I think this sort of thing should be done as a separate process in
front of the postmaster.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-08-31 13:10:07 Re: COPY and heap_sync
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2014-08-31 10:01:11 Re: pg_filedump for 9.4?