| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: holdable cursors |
| Date: | 2003-03-30 20:14:09 |
| Message-ID: | 5402.1049055249@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> - I needed to change the tuple store API slightly -- it assumes that it
> won't be used to hold data across transaction boundaries, so the temp
> files that it uses for on-disk storage are automatically reclaimed at
> end-of-transaction. I added a flag to tuplestore_begin_heap() to control
> this behavior. Is changing the tuple store API in this fashion OK?
What do you do to ensure the temp files *do* get cleaned up eventually?
> To workaround this, I've temporarily hacked up a solution
> that works,
I'm not real pleased with the fact that this patch has already been
applied while it still contains a "temporary hack". Please fix this
soon.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-03-30 20:28:16 | Re: holdable cursors |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-30 20:09:56 | Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster |