Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Olleg Samojlov" <olleg(at)jane(dot)telecom(dot)mipt(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
Date: 2003-04-04 14:25:13
Message-ID: 5400.1049466313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> Somehow I did not see that conclusion made.
> I thought, at least for JDBC, it is already successfully used ?

Barry, at least, seemed to be happy with removing it, given the planned
protocol change to report current transaction state after every query.

> I think the backend autocommit is useful. Maybe only the
> installation/database/user wide GUC setting should be depricated/
> disabled, so it is only used by a session SET ?

That wouldn't really solve any of the problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-04 14:37:45 Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
Previous Message Jeffrey D. Brower 2003-04-04 12:45:29 Re: [HACKERS] OSS database needed for testing