Re: Internal error codes triggered by tests

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Internal error codes triggered by tests
Date: 2024-07-04 08:00:01
Message-ID: 53b6ce8e-e94e-500a-df4a-32f9c9eb56a9@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Michael,

04.07.2024 03:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 10:56:43AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Thanks. I'll look again at that once v18 opens up for business.
> Looked at that again, and one in tablecmds.c is not needed anymore,
> and there was a conflict in be-secure-openssl.c. Removed the first
> one, fixed the second one, then applied the patch after a second look.

Could you please share your thoughts regarding other error cases, which is
not triggered by existing tests, but still can be easily reached by users?

For example:
SELECT satisfies_hash_partition(1, 1, 0, 0);

ERROR:  XX000: could not open relation with OID 1
LOCATION:  relation_open, relation.c:61

or:
CREATE TABLE t (b bytea);
INSERT INTO t SELECT ''::bytea;
CREATE INDEX brinidx ON t USING brin
 (b bytea_bloom_ops(n_distinct_per_range = -1.0));

ERROR:  XX000: the bloom filter is too large (44629 > 8144)
LOCATION:  bloom_init, brin_bloom.c:344

Should such cases be corrected too?

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-07-04 08:04:47 RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-07-04 07:44:30 Re: Logical Replication of sequences