From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. |
Date: | 2014-08-26 20:59:11 |
Message-ID: | 53FCF51F.9090405@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/26/14 4:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Is the whole topic actually practically relevant?
It's clearly not all that important, or otherwise we'd have heard about
before now.
I suppose someone could do something like
wal_receiver_status_interval = 10ms
and end up silently turning the whole thing off instead of making it
very aggressive.
The mistake here is that the mathematically appropriate turn-off value
in this and similar cases is infinity, not zero.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-08-26 21:03:12 | Re: Missing comment block at the top of streamutil.h and receivelog.h |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-08-26 20:56:05 | Re: proposal: rounding up time value less than its unit. |