From: | Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lars Ewald (web(dot)de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: Compile fails on AIX 6.1 |
Date: | 2014-08-04 05:56:40 |
Message-ID: | 53DF2098.9040207@spg.schulergroup.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Please try the IBM C/C++ compiler.
Could you use 9.3.5? This is the latest 9.3.x version.
I have tested 9.3.5 on AIX 6.1 and AIX 7.1 without a compilation/test
failure.
Please could you post your exact ./configure call?
Bye
Rainer
On 01.08.2014 19:59, Lars Ewald (web.de) wrote:
> Hello Tom
>
> > We don't really consider a platform
> > supported unless it's got working spinlocks.
>
> I am a little bit confused about that.
>
> On the page "supported platforms" there is written that PowerPC or
> PowerPC 64 is a supported
> platform, so that I can compile postgres WITH spinlocks.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/supported-platforms.html
>
> Or is there a problem on the specific machine? Or is there something
> disabled
> in the kernel?
>
> Best regards
> Lars
>
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> hat am 26. Juli 2014 um 00:32 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > "Lars Ewald (web.de)" <l(dot)ewald-web(at)lars-ewald(dot)de> writes:
> > > Hello Tom,
> > > today I was able to do some tests compiling Postgres on our AIX
> machine.
> >
> > > And...it worked! :-) Configuring without spinlocks and readline
> worked fine for
> > > me and did not abort after compiling xlog.o/xlog.c.
> > > Any ideas why it does not work with spinlocks?
> >
> > Well, spinlocks are what uses the assembler code that you're having
> > trouble with.
> >
> > Note that while you can build with --disable-spinlocks, performance is
> > not likely to be acceptable. We don't really consider a platform
> > supported unless it's got working spinlocks.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pankhuri.sai | 2014-08-04 06:49:24 | BUG #11120: Decrease in no. of rows while sorting |
Previous Message | Asif Naeem | 2014-08-04 05:22:32 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip kumar | 2014-08-04 06:11:57 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
Previous Message | Asif Naeem | 2014-08-04 05:22:32 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |