Re: Unifying the spec files?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unifying the spec files?
Date: 2014-07-31 11:18:00
Message-ID: 53DA25E8.70904@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/30/2014 04:35 PM, Devrim Gündüz wrote:

> While working on it can you please change
>
> BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) to BuildRequires:
> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
>
> for cosmetic reasons :-)

I think it's meant to be the other way around actually.

The first says "I want a package named this".

The second says "I want this Perl module".

so I'd rather

BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)

>> I've versioned the Provides:
>
> I am not whether this is right or not. OS-related packages may be
> broken, since we supply versioned Provides... Did you try
> installing libreoffice, for example?

Haven't tested this yet, still dealing with some other work items.

- --
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT2iXlAAoJELBXNkqjr+S2AGYH/1BVX+My0uaEZnNdi4FgHpZn
2W5gjlOTGCfNXEOZkLLBNLKZt2+LnFJKEM2SPSIEiIPcEdvkDtUUozW7PM0nYIAO
fiRUBY8/V4MU1crvt10NJVuNUeOkf9rrzgrSUIaMSdozuwdcWY2MrKT9edtnfZ5V
EjvVnvRpPSegLhcDJfud5tY2cdnkT0gX0E/5INX0RGMCI09RRwQYXwPmgHsDXZbb
FrCMDtMeP6zws6BzaaXMYoCFetMz09cpcZiDCTfn1PNxTATM8S2ncJKNHY2lf6Id
mlwsOt+jX3Sb7wj8ziM1P5dC3cHsx5xuCu3XVXf7CjvwUjdWyGX4mAUzYS/x2ik=
=8piV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-07-31 17:35:26 Re: Unifying the spec files?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-07-31 09:56:26 Re: Unifying the spec files?