From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Built-in binning functions |
Date: | 2014-07-18 18:20:32 |
Message-ID: | 53C96570.2080100@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/07/14 02:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, the set of functions provided still needs more thought, because the
> resolution of overloaded functions doesn't really work as nicely as all
> that.
I am honestly considering just removing special case for int8 for now,
the sql standard width_bucket has only support for float8 and numeric,
maybe it's enough for this one also...
What's your opinion on that?
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-07-18 18:23:32 | Re: Making joins involving ctid work for the benefit of UPSERT |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-07-18 18:14:34 | Re: Making joins involving ctid work for the benefit of UPSERT |