Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?
Date: 2014-07-16 14:19:40
Message-ID: 53C689FC.5090705@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/16/2014 07:08 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We performed an upgrade via pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.3 a while back, and I'm almost certain we were bitten by this bug:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de
>
> Finding the discussion is nice... but what do we do to fix this? I read through the discussion, and it *seems* we can delete the 0000 file and restart since it's only an 8k file and we haven't gone far enough to wrap into a new 0000 file. Will that actually work, though? Or is it too late, since something has already requested that invalid transaction? What do we do?

See here:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/20140702pg_upgrade_fix

>
> --
> Shaun Thomas
> OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
> 312-676-8870
> sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaun Thomas 2014-07-16 14:24:12 Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2014-07-16 14:08:20 We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next?