From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? |
Date: | 2014-07-16 14:19:40 |
Message-ID: | 53C689FC.5090705@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/16/2014 07:08 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We performed an upgrade via pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.3 a while back, and I'm almost certain we were bitten by this bug:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de
>
> Finding the discussion is nice... but what do we do to fix this? I read through the discussion, and it *seems* we can delete the 0000 file and restart since it's only an 8k file and we haven't gone far enough to wrap into a new 0000 file. Will that actually work, though? Or is it too late, since something has already requested that invalid transaction? What do we do?
See here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/20140702pg_upgrade_fix
>
> --
> Shaun Thomas
> OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
> 312-676-8870
> sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2014-07-16 14:24:12 | Re: We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? |
Previous Message | Shaun Thomas | 2014-07-16 14:08:20 | We've been affected by a pg_upgrade bug. What do we do next? |