Re: Audit of logout

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Audit of logout
Date: 2014-07-02 21:23:31
Message-ID: 53B47853.3050905@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/02/2014 02:15 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2014-07-02 16:47:16 -0400, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> If we expect that the author is going to update the patch, the
>> right state to use is "Waiting on author".
>
> Quite so. That's how I understand it, and what I've been doing. But
> what if we really *don't* expect the author to update the patch,
> but they do it anyway? That's the only case I was referring to.
>
> If the right thing to do is to open an entry in the next CF (as you
> said earlier in your mail), that's all right with me.

In any case I think this side discussion has proven there is not
universal understanding on the particulars and in any case we ought to
have clear definitions (probably with examples) documented somewhere
if anyone is expected to take them quite so specifically.

Also, given Tom's remarks on the other part of this thread, I would
not be surprised if this turned out to be a much larger change than
Fujii-san originally hoped for, and thus may in fact get delayed to
next CF.

Joe

- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=afxT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2014-07-02 21:27:09 Re: Can simplify 'limit 1' with slow function?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-02 21:20:05 Re: Audit of logout