From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Audit of logout |
Date: | 2014-07-02 14:39:54 |
Message-ID: | 53B419BA.5030701@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/2014 11:55 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hmm... I found that you had marked this proposal as "Returned with
> Feedback". But I don't think that we reached the consensus to do
> that. I think that it's still worth discussing this topic in this
> CF. So I marked this as "Needs Review" again.
>
> If you strongly think that this proposal should be marked as
> "Returned with Feedback", could you let me know why you think so?
Returned with Feedback means, well exactly that ;-) -- the patch as
linked to the CF page is wrong and cannot be applied the way it is
currently. It is therefore returned to you to be fixed. It does not
mean "Rejected" which is what you seem to infer.
As mentioned on the CF the documentation change is flat wrong, and you
yourself have said that you think PGC_SUSET is wrong now and
PGC_SIGHUP should be used instead.
Furthermore I doubt you have tested the change to PGC_SIGHUP because I
did a quick test, and for some reason I haven't yet tracked down SHOW
does not see the change to log_disconnections as you said it would
after a reload, unlike other PGC_SIGHUP vars. So there is more
thought, testing, and possibly coding needed to make this a viable change.
Joe
- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=tiPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-02 14:40:04 | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-02 14:15:28 | Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries. |