From: | Dave McGuire <mcguire(at)neurotica(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Klos <john(at)ziaspace(dot)com>, port-vax(at)netbsd(dot)org, vax(at)openbsd(dot)org, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD |
Date: | 2014-06-29 19:10:41 |
Message-ID: | 53B064B1.6040307@neurotica.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/29/2014 02:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, the issue from our point of view is that a lot of what we care about
> testing is extremely low-level hardware behavior, like whether spinlocks
> work as expected across processors. It's not clear that a simulator would
> provide a sufficiently accurate emulation.
Oh ok, I understand. Thank you for the clarification.
> OTOH, the really nasty issues like cache coherency rules don't arise in
> single-processor systems. So unless you have a multiprocessor VAX
> available to spin up, a simulator may tell us as much as we'd learn
> anyway.
>
> (If you have got one, maybe some cash could be found --- we do have
> project funds available, and I think they'd be well spent on testing
> purposes. I don't make those decisions though.)
I have several multiprocessor VAXen, but only one of them is capable
of running NetBSD, and I only (currently) have a single processor in
that machine. I can (and want to) fix that, but not right away.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ/3
New Kensington, PA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anders Magnusson | 2014-06-29 19:12:03 | Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD |
Previous Message | Patrick Finnegan | 2014-06-29 19:10:02 | Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD |