From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: SQL access to database attributes |
Date: | 2014-06-26 17:19:57 |
Message-ID: | 53AC563D.5040509@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/23/2014 06:45 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-06-23 18:39 GMT+02:00 Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com
> <mailto:vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>>:
>
> On 06/23/2014 06:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Pavel Stehule
> <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >> I found only one problem - first patch introduce a new property
> >> CONNECTION_LIMIT and replace previously used "CONNECTION LIMIT" in
> >> documentation. But "CONNECTION LIMIT" is still supported, but it
> is not
> >> documented. So for some readers it can look like breaking
> compatibility, but
> >> it is false. This should be documented better.
> >
> > Yeah, I think the old syntax should be documented also.
>
> Why do we want to document syntax that should eventually be deprecated?
>
>
> It is fair to our users. It can be deprecated, ok, we can write in doc -
> this feature will be deprecated in next three years. Don't use it, but
> this should be documentated.
Okay, here is version two of the refactoring patch that documents that
the with-space version is deprecated but still accepted.
The feature patch is not affected by this and so I am not attaching a
new version of that.
--
Vik
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
createdb_alterdb_grammar_refactoring.v2.patch | text/x-diff | 19.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-26 17:55:24 | Re: Changes in amcanreturn() interface to support multicolumn indexes |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-06-26 17:04:52 | Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL |