Re: how to improve perf of 131MM row table?

OK, the sample query is attached (hopefully attachments are allowed) as
"query.sql".
The "master table" definition is attached as "table1.sql".
The "detail table" definition is attached as "table2.sql".
The EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) output is here:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/vd5

Let me know if I can provide anything else, and thank you again.

-AJ

On 6/25/2014 5:55 PM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 04:40 PM, Aaron Weber wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, I guess I wasn't clear about some other particulars
>> The query's where clause is only an "IN", with a list of id's (those
>> I mentioned are the PK), and the join is explicitly on the PK (so,
>> indexed).
>
> Indexed doesn't mean indexed if the wrong datatypes are used. We need
> to see the table and index definitions, and a sample query with
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>
>> An IN with 50 int values took 23sec to return (by way of example).
>
> To me, this sounds like a sequence scan, or one of your key matches so
> many rows, the random seeks are throwing off your performance. Of
> course, I can't confirm that without EXPLAIN output.
>