From: | Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension |
Date: | 2014-06-26 02:41:58 |
Message-ID: | 53AB8876.4010500@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25/06/14 16:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 14/06/25 15:13, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I assigned my self as reviewer of the patch. I gone through the
>> mail chain discussion and in that question has been raised about
>> the feature and its implementation, so would like to know what is
>> the current status of this project/patch.
>>
>> Regards,
>
> I'll be submitting a revised version of this patch very shortly.
Revised version of the patch attached, which implements the expansion
of "primary key" in the rewrite phase per Tom Lane's suggestion upthread [*]
[*] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28583.1402325169@sss.pgh.pa.us
Regards
Ian Barwick
--
Ian Barwick http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
returning_primary_key.cf2.patch | text/x-patch | 25.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-06-26 03:07:05 | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-26 02:14:24 | Re: sorting a union over inheritance vs pathkeys |