Re: A question about code in DefineRelation()

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Hadi Moshayedi <hadi(at)moshayedi(dot)net>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A question about code in DefineRelation()
Date: 2014-06-24 10:32:45
Message-ID: 53A953CD.5020309@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/25/2014 04:39 PM, Hadi Moshayedi wrote:
>>
>> On second thought I noticed that that makes CREATE FOREIGN TABLE include
>> an OID column in newly-created foreign tables wrongly, when the
>> default_with_oids parameter is set to on. Please find attached a patch.

Yeah, that's a bug.

The interactions with pg_dump are interesting. If you have any tables
with OIDs in your database, pg_dump will output "set
default_with_oids=true" before creating those tables. And if you have
any foreign tables that end up being dumped after the table with OIDs,
it will also be created with "default_with_oids=true", and will end up
with OIDs.

Fortunately, nothing very bad happens if a foreign table has oids. It
will just be all-zeros if you select it.

Committed, and backpatched. 9.2 and 9.1 needed a slightly different
patch because the code has changed, but it was still straightforward.

> The fix makes sense to me, since in ALTER TABLE SET WITH OIDS we check that
> the relation is a table and not a foreign table:
>
> 3160 case AT_AddOids: /* SET WITH OIDS */
> 3161 ATSimplePermissions(rel, ATT_TABLE);
>
> So, I think we should be consistent between DefineRelation() and alter
> table.

Yeah, default_with_oids is definitely not supposed to affect foreign tables.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message geohas 2014-06-24 10:49:17 Hooks Docu - list of hooks
Previous Message David Rowley 2014-06-24 10:32:21 Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins