Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Date: 2014-06-21 21:54:58
Message-ID: 53A5FF32.4000206@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/21/2014 08:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> OK, so I think we want to see a patch based on v1 (FATAL approach)
> with a change of the name to idle_in_transaction_session_timeout
> and the units changed to milliseconds. I don't see why the
> remoteversion test shouldn't be changed to use 90500 now, too.

The attached patch, rebased to current master, addresses all of these
issues.

> I'll flip this to Waiting on Author for those changes.

And back to Needs Review.
--
Vik

Attachment Content-Type Size
iitt.v3.patch text/x-diff 8.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2014-06-21 22:10:45 Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2014-06-21 21:18:33 Re: SQL access to database attributes