From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink |
Date: | 2014-06-20 19:31:06 |
Message-ID: | 53A48BFA.1000403@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2014 03:38 PM, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
>> Fair enough -- this patch does it at that level in
>> materializeQueryResult()
>
> I'm in favor of this. TBH, I did this at first, but I was afraid
> this would be rejected due to the reason mentioned earlier.
>
> if statement in PG_TRY block is not necessary like this, because
> sinfo is zero-cleared.
Right -- pushed that way, back-patched through 9.2
Joe
- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=6It5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-20 19:34:33 | Re: Shouldn't pg_(sh)seclabel.provider be marked NOT NULL? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-06-20 17:39:31 | Re: JSON and Postgres Variable Queries |