From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Minmax indexes |
Date: | 2014-06-17 21:34:49 |
Message-ID: | 53A0B479.8080103@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/17/2014 09:14 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, I don't know: suppose you're loading geospatial data showing the
> location of every building in some country. It might easily be the
> case that the data is or can be loaded in an order that provides
> pretty good spatial locality, leading to tight bounding boxes over
> physically consecutive data ranges.
I admin a production application which has exactly this. However, that
application doesn't have big enough data to benefit from minmax indexes;
it uses the basic spatial indexes.
So, my $0.02: bounding box minmax falls under the heading of "would be
nice to have, but not if it delays the feature".
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-06-17 21:35:54 | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-06-17 21:28:53 | Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn() |