Re: Minmax indexes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minmax indexes
Date: 2014-06-17 21:34:49
Message-ID: 53A0B479.8080103@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/17/2014 09:14 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, I don't know: suppose you're loading geospatial data showing the
> location of every building in some country. It might easily be the
> case that the data is or can be loaded in an order that provides
> pretty good spatial locality, leading to tight bounding boxes over
> physically consecutive data ranges.

I admin a production application which has exactly this. However, that
application doesn't have big enough data to benefit from minmax indexes;
it uses the basic spatial indexes.

So, my $0.02: bounding box minmax falls under the heading of "would be
nice to have, but not if it delays the feature".

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-06-17 21:35:54 Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-06-17 21:28:53 Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()