Re: slotname vs slot_name

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date: 2014-06-05 19:53:17
Message-ID: 5390CAAD.5030809@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/06/14 19:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> On June 5, 2014 7:43:06 PM CEST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> For my part, I'd strongly prefer a name based on the term "logical
>>>> decoding".
>>
>>> There is no reason not to use long names, so I think
>> pg_logical_decoding
>>> is fine.
>>
>> +1
>
> Still not a fan oft having decoding in the name. I've at least one patch pending (replication identifiers, submitted a couple months back) that will need to stash a couple of files somewhere. And it's for the apply side, not the decoding side.
>

Personally I like your suggestion of pg_logical

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Linos 2014-06-05 21:09:46 Re: performance regression in 9.2/9.3
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-06-05 18:14:55 Re: recovery testing for beta