Re: Jsonb: jbvBinary usage in the convertJsonbValue?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Jsonb: jbvBinary usage in the convertJsonbValue?
Date: 2014-06-02 15:38:16
Message-ID: 538C9A68.3080303@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/02/2014 10:22 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2014 10:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Dmitry Dolgov
>> <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I'm little confused by the convertJsonbValue functon at jsonb_utils.c
>>> Maybe I misunderstood something, so I need help =)
>>>
>>>>>> if (IsAJsonbScalar(val) || val->type == jbvBinary)
>>>>>> convertJsonbScalar(buffer, header, val);
>>> As I can see, the convertJsonbScalar function is used for scalar and
>>> binary
>>> jsonb values. But this function doesn't handle the jbvBinary type.
>> There definitely seems to be an oversight here of some kind. Either
>> convertJsonbValue() shouldn't be calling convertJsonbScalar() with an
>> object of type jbvBinary, or convertJsonbScalar() should know how to
>> handle that case.
>>
>
>
> Yes, I've just been looking at that. I think this is probably a
> hangover from when these routines were recast to some extent. Given
> that we're not seeing any errors from it, I'd be inclined to remove
> the the "|| val->type == jbvBinary" part. One of the three call sites
> to convertJsonbValue asserts that this can't be true, and doing so
> doesn't result in a regression failure.
>
> Peter and Teodor, comments?
>
>

Thinking about it a bit more, ISTM this should be ok, since we convert a
JsonbValue to Jsonb in a depth-first recursive pattern. We should
certainly add some comments along these lines to explain why the
jbvbinary case shouldn't arise.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-02 15:42:19 Re: Allowing join removals for more join types
Previous Message ash 2014-06-02 15:18:28 Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE?