From: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat directory and pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2014-05-28 19:55:16 |
Message-ID: | 53863F24.8050805@fuzzy.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28.5.2014 19:52, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> But pg_stat_statements file is saved under $PGDATA/global yet.
>>> Is this intentional or just oversight?
>>
>>
>> I think it's an oversight.
>
> OK, patch attached.
>
> I'm afraid that it's not okay to change the file layout in $PGDATA at this beta1
> stage because that change basically seems to need initdb. Otherwise something
> like "no such file or directory" error can happen. But in this case what we need
> to change is only the location of the pg_stat_statements permanent stats file.
> So, without initdb, the server will not be able to find the
> pg_stat_statements stats
> file, but this is not so harmful. Only the problem is that the
> pg_stat_statements
> stats which were collected in past would disappear. OTOH, the server can keep
> running successfully from then and no critical data will not
> disappear. Therefore
> I think we can commit this patch even at beta1. Thought?
For HEAD, probably yes. But what about backpatching 9.3?
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Lumby | 2014-05-28 20:52:47 | Re: Extended Prefetching using Asynchronous IO - proposal and patch |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-05-28 19:50:04 | Re: jsonb failed assertions |