Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers

From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Stephen Frost *EXTERN* <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Date: 2014-05-27 15:09:41
Message-ID: 5384AAB5.6030307@optionshouse.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 05/27/2014 10:00 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:

> I know that Oracle recommends it - they even built an NFS client
> into their database server to make the most of it.

That's odd. Every time the subject of NFS comes up, it's almost
immediately shot down with explicit advice to Never Do That(tm). It can
be kinda safe-ish if mounted in sync mode with caching disabled, but I'd
never use it on any of our systems.

We also have this in the Wiki:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Shared_Storage

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse, LLC | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2014-05-27 15:18:47 Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2014-05-27 15:00:01 Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers